Skip to content

General Damages in Atlantic Canada

How Settlements Compare with Court Awards

Reviewed by Michael Murphy, K.C., Senior Counsel · Updated

Understanding how settlements compare with court awards matters because almost every injury claim settles. The reported decisions that set the ranges come from the small minority that ran to judgment. A settlement figure and an award are not the same measurement, and treating one as the other leads to bad expectations.

Reported Awards Are the Contested Tail

Claims go to judgment when the parties disagree about liability, about the medical evidence, or about the plaintiff’s credibility. Straightforward claims settle and are never reported. The published awards therefore describe a filtered set of the hardest cases, which is why counsel read them as a range instead of as a price list. Atlantic decisions are searchable on CanLII.

A Settlement Prices Risk as Well as Injury

A settlement figure discounts for the chance of losing outright, for a finding of contributory negligence, for the possibility a judge prefers the defence medical evidence, and for the years and the cost of reaching trial. A claim with a serious injury and a weak liability case settles below its assessed range. A claim with admitted liability and a contested injury settles closer to it.

Settlements Are Global and Confidential

A settlement is one sum releasing every head of damage at once. It is not broken into general damages, wage loss and future care unless the parties choose to do that, and the amount is normally confidential. That is why no public database of settlement values exists, and why any figure quoted as typical for an injury should be treated with caution.

How Settlements Compare with Court Awards in Practice

Both sides value a claim against the decided cases, so how courts assess general damages governs the negotiation even though no judge will assess anything. Where a minor injury cap applies, the negotiation is mostly an argument about whether the injury meets the regulatory definition.

Formal Offers Change the Cost of Refusing

The rules of court in each Atlantic province allow a party to make a formal offer to settle. A party who refuses one and then does worse at trial can face costs consequences for the period after the offer. That mechanism pushes both sides toward a realistic number as trial approaches. What happens when it fails is set out in how a trial fixes general damages.

What the Firm Does

The firm values a claim against the decided cases before making a demand on car accident files, with no fee unless the claim resolves.

A laptop carrying the firm's logo in the Moncton office

Call the Nearest Office

506-854-5157

Tell Us What Happened

Start a Claim

Chat Now